attention as the two nations work to finalize South Korea’s financial contributions for hosting U.S. Forces Korea (USFK) beyond 2026. Sources familiar with the talks suggest a deal could be reached by the end of this year, spurred by the prospect of a potential second Trump administration and both nations’ desire to lock in terms ahead of the 2024 U.S. presidential election.
The negotiations are taking place against the backdrop of a complex history of cost-sharing agreements, notably the challenges encountered during the transition from the Trump to Biden administrations. South Korea, in particular, is keen to avoid repeating those difficulties by settling the deal swiftly. However, some worry that rushing the process could lead to backlash—especially if former President Trump, who once pushed for a significant increase in South Korea’s share of costs, returns to office.
Overview of the Special Measures Agreement (SMA)
The SMA determines how much South Korea will contribute toward offsetting the expenses of maintaining roughly 28,000 U.S. troops stationed on the Korean Peninsula. While South Korea already provides land and facilities free of charge under the Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA), the SMA allows both nations to share the costs for personnel, logistics, and military construction.
The current SMA, signed in 2021, covers the six years from 2020 to 2025, setting South Korea’s 2021 contribution at approximately $1 billion, a 13.9% increase from the previous year. This marked the highest increase since the 25.7% spike seen during the 2002 negotiations. Under the terms of the 11th SMA, South Korea’s contributions are adjusted in line with its defense budget through 2025, which means that cost-sharing amounts could rise again in the following agreement.
Financial Contributions and Growing Costs
For example, with South Korea’s defense budget projected to grow by 3.6% next year, the U.S. expects the country’s contributions to approach 1.4 trillion won (approx. $1.2 billion). If another increase similar to the 13.9% hike from the previous agreement is applied, South Korea’s contributions could reach as high as 1.6 trillion won ($1.35 billion).
The defense cost-sharing agreement between the U.S. and South Korea, which covers the expenses of maintaining U.S. Forces Korea (USFK), is typically renegotiated every five years. If a new deal is reached and ratified before the U.S. presidential election on November 5, it could extend through 2030, potentially shaping the future of this vital alliance.
South Korea currently shoulders a significant portion of the financial responsibility for hosting the roughly 28,000 U.S. troops stationed on its soil, an obligation funded from its annual defense budget. For 2025, Seoul’s contribution is expected to hit 1.4 trillion won, or approximately $1.2 billion. This would account for around 2.3% of South Korea’s projected defense budget, which is set to reach 61.5 trillion won (about $51.5 billion).
To put this in perspective, South Korea’s 2025 defense contribution represents roughly 0.06% of its total GDP, which stood at $1.7 trillion in 2023. Since the Special Measures Agreement (SMA) was first established in 1991, South Korea’s contributions have increased 13-fold, while its overall defense budget has grown by only six times, placing increasing financial strain on the country.
On a per-capita basis, South Korea spends approximately 53 million won (around $44,000) annually per U.S. soldier stationed on the peninsula. Critics argue the actual cost is even higher when factoring in indirect expenses like tax exemptions and land provisions. According to an official from the Center for Peace and Disarmament at the People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy, when all costs are considered, South Korea’s total support could exceed 2 trillion won, or roughly $1.7 billion, pushing the cost per soldier to over 70 million won (around $58,000).
As negotiations continue, both nations will need to balance their shared strategic interests with the growing financial pressures on South Korea. The outcome of these talks will not only impact the U.S. presence on the peninsula but could also set the tone for future defense cost-sharing arrangements in the region.
Comparative Analysis of Contributions Among Allies
South Korea’s financial contributions to the U.S. military presence on its soil rank among the highest compared to other key American allies, such as Japan and Germany. Under the current Special Measures Agreement (SMA), signed in 2021 and covering 2020 to 2025, Japan contributes $1.9 billion annually, while South Korea provides $850 million, and Germany follows with $600 million. In raw numbers, Japan leads, with South Korea and Germany trailing behind.
However, South Korea bears the heaviest burden when considering these contributions as a percentage of GDP. Seoul’s contribution represents 0.057% of its GDP, a much larger share than Japan’s 0.037% and Germany’s 0.027%. This underscores the disproportionate financial load South Korea carries relative to the size of its economy.
South Korea’s situation is also distinct in that its contributions are set to rise in line with its growing defense budget. South Korea allocates 2.3% of its GDP to defense spending, far higher than the roughly 1% spent by Japan and Germany. This link between rising defense costs and the SMA has sparked concerns, particularly during the negotiations for the 11th agreement, where officials feared the growing financial strain on Seoul.
While South Korea’s support for U.S. Forces Korea (USFK) has increased 13-fold since the first cost-sharing agreement in 1991, the number of U.S. troops stationed there has decreased significantly—from over 40,000 to approximately 28,000 today. Complicating matters further, South Korea has consistently purchased advanced U.S. military equipment, adding to its financial commitments.
This rising cost of defense-sharing has raised questions among some experts. One military analyst observed, “As South Korea continues to bolster its own defense capabilities and prepares to assume wartime operational control, it’s paradoxical that the cost-sharing agreement keeps rising, even as the country becomes less reliant on U.S. Forces Korea.”
Most Commented